Who is to blame: the ultra-Orthodox parents or the state?
The state claims that it provides education to all children according to the law. It emphasized that, "The plaintiffs, as well as their parents, could have chosen the school that fits their needs, worldview, and way of life from a variety of schools, as they indeed did."
"The plaintiffs studied in schools according to their parents' and their own choice," the defense stated, "as far as they are concerned these studies have caused them 'damage' … it is to be expected that they point their claim to their parents or to the schools in which they studied."
Shlomo Lecker, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said in response to the state's actions that, "In a style that befits a common insurance company, the state is shirking responsibility. It has no obligation to support extra education for those who desire it, and everyone is responsible for the neglect of education accept for it: The plaintiffs who did not choose to 'change frameworks' at age eight, the parents who didn't choose to send (their) children to expensive private education institutions, the yeshivas that are not effectively overseen."
Telem Yahav